Thread: Dogs Victoria - wait till you read this

If we have established that the ANKC are operating contrary to the FCI requirements...........would it be more effective to bombard the FCI with complaints against the ANKC???. The ANKC needs to come under fire from the FCI with their associate membership threatened unless they follow the required protocol. It would also provide a valid reason to propose for another body to replace the ANKC's FCI membership. It appears that the ANKC believe they can do as they please and needs the hammer to fall upon them from a greater power (FCI) in hope that they pull their heads in.

The ANKC appears to be a dictatorial boys club of one sided discussions that fails to allow any form of democracy. How can they form "attack training" Schutzhund policies from the opnions of people responsible for implementing change who have no idea what Schutzhund is???. How can they make policy without input apposing their argument from the people involved in Schutzhund to present a balanced debate on the subject???. In a democracy, the ANKC could never win an anti-Schutzhund debate and requires it to conduct policy making through the back door of a closed shop to create ammendments that essentially don't hold water in reality???. The more I look into the ANKC's operation, the more of a joke this outfit appear to be IMHO.

Darryl