+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Requirements of the Stud Dog.

                  
   
  1. #11
    John Evans
    Guest
    [=Neville Patterson;15927][=John Evans;15923]If you’re breeding working dogs and you’re primarily concerned with conformation (as in the breed standard recognised by “Kennel Clubs”) then in the case of GSDs you’d be hard pressed to breed anything worth a carrot as a working dog. You breed from proven genetic qualities you want, especially in working dogs; those genetic qualities/traits may produce courage, character, reliability, fitness, size, other physical attributes such as grip etc and are tried and tested from progeny to progeny, appearance (as in a pretty dog) is probably the last thing working dog trainers are concerned about. If you are breeding show dogs then conformation is paramount in your genetic search, and we know how much most show GSDs depart from working GSDs both physically and mentally, as do show Malinois.[/]

    John,

    I don't see that a showline GSD does comply with the breed standards in conformation. The working line dogs are far closer to the original standards than any modern day showline. Most of the showline males are too big, too slow in their movements, too heavy and cumbersome, too angulated with short back legs. Show results amounts to a judges opinion, but if you really study the GSD conformation by the breed standards, the showline dogs I think are miles out. More working line GSD's I think actually have the physique of the original dog way above the dogs who the judges select to win the shows.

    Cheers
    Nev[/]


    Nev

    I think the pertinent words there is "original standards", which are few and far between unfortunately.
    Most present day show line GSDs are in my opinion freakish deformed dogs with little or no resemblance to old-time dogs or in fact MOST well-bred working line GSDs; which are really not easy to find in this country. Yet this is what the show aficionados consider the perfectly “conformed” GSD.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to John Evans For This Useful Post:

    Neville Patterson (11-21-2010)

  3. #12
    Amy P
    Guest
    The Standard in original form has rarely been changed. I believe questioning the standard is to question the breed itself, therefore get the breed that works, not alter the breed. Standard,which is our blueprint for everything related to a specific breed of dog. Extremes of the standard are found, be it poor conformation, weak nerves, work ethic etc....Explosive drives and punishing grips can also be taken as one of these "extremes".....A man with a chip on his shoulder, can be the same as a dog with one, difference is who trains and nurtures his talents!

    Conformation showing, not my cup of Tea, but understanding my breed and spending years learning and living with them i have come to see the faults lay with the matings, and of course pot luck!

    Cheers
    Amy

  4. #13
    Amy P
    Guest
    [=John Evans;15923]If you’re breeding working dogs and you’re primarily concerned with conformation (as in the breed standard recognised by “Kennel Clubs”) then in the case of GSDs you’d be hard pressed to breed anything worth a carrot as a working dog. You breed from proven genetic qualities you want, especially in working dogs; those genetic qualities/traits may produce courage, character, reliability, fitness, size, other physical attributes such as grip etc and are tried and tested from progeny to progeny, appearance (as in a pretty dog) is probably the last thing working dog trainers are concerned about. If you are breeding show dogs then conformation is paramount in your genetic search, and we know how much most show GSDs depart from working GSDs both physically and mentally, as do show Malinois.[/]


    I agree. Neither is a balanced approach, i personally see conformation as the dog itself not whether it is straight in pastern or wet in the head (my breed) aesthetics are not essential to a work animal, but conformation which is breed type, and Good health is...

    Personally, i think the word "conformation" is swapped for the word "Aesthetic" in these discussions, as when we say pretty dogs this is Aesthetic.
    Last edited by Amy P; 11-22-2010 at 04:26 PM.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Amy P For This Useful Post:

    Robert Santori (11-23-2010)

  6. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    322
    Thanks
    294
    Thanked 371 Times in 191 Posts
    [=Amy Pattison;15938][=John Evans;15923]If you’re breeding working dogs and you’re primarily concerned with conformation (as in the breed standard recognised by “Kennel Clubs”) then in the case of GSDs you’d be hard pressed to breed anything worth a carrot as a working dog. You breed from proven genetic qualities you want, especially in working dogs; those genetic qualities/traits may produce courage, character, reliability, fitness, size, other physical attributes such as grip etc and are tried and tested from progeny to progeny, appearance (as in a pretty dog) is probably the last thing working dog trainers are concerned about. If you are breeding show dogs then conformation is paramount in your genetic search, and we know how much most show GSDs depart from working GSDs both physically and mentally, as do show Malinois.[/]


    I agree. Neither is a balanced approach, i personally see conformation as the dog itself not whether it is straight in pastern or wet in the head (my breed) aesthetics are not essential to a work animal, but conformation which is breed type, and Good health is...

    Personally, i think the word "conformation" is swapped for the word "Aesthetic" in these discussions, as when we say pretty dogs this is Aesthetic.[/]

    Amy,

    I think people often get the wrong end of the stick regarding conformation and the breed standards. Fax vom Grenzganger had good conformation Kkl 1 rating even an SG rated working line dog is good conformation and breedworthy, but neither would win a show. It's like a Schutzhund titled dog will comply with temperament and character, but may not win a Schutzhund sporting trial, but within a breeding I think these basics should be aspired to.

    If a working line GSD achieves an SG show rating it's good enough and passes the breedworthy test, but if it has a disqualifying fault, it shouldn't be bred regardless of it's working ability which the dog then becomes an extreme at one end. A good working dog doesn't need show winning conformation, it needs only compliant conformation without disqualifying faults. A GSD must have an SG rating to compete at a WUSV Schutzhund trial which all WUSV entrants are considered dogs of breed standards compliance.

    Cheers
    Nev

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Neville Patterson For This Useful Post:

    Robert Santori (11-24-2010)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Visitors found this page by searching for:

stud dog list requirements

stud dog requirements

powered by vBulletin choosing a dog for family

SEO Blog

Members who have read this thread : 8

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts