You missed my point, many have made it clear in this thread that ideally more titling going on would be great if access to clubs and legislation made it easier. The whole situation with the SV and emergence of the RSV2000 should be a reminder that having some kind of system is only going to be
as credible as the people who uphold it.
I don't understand why you are giving some members a hard time who may not be able to accessibly title their dogs in Schutzhund, but are perhaps involved in other avenues of temperament and character testing. Consider what's absolutely important here. The whole point of Schutzhund was to preserve and evaluate the temperament qualities of the
gsd for working purposes. If handlers/breeders are already using and proving them for working purposes it doesn't make a shred of sense to say that has less value. If you can't realise that good german Shepherds with proper working temperament exist in titled and untitled populations, and that preserving working abilities depends mostly on the motives and knowledge of breeders, not a title (while still an achievement is no absolute indication), then that is all there is to say.
I have probably said too much as I still have lots to learn but I know enough not to sound like I have absolute blind faith in the SV system, unless they raise their standards
Robert wrote:
Not really imo, it is a bit hard to debate when alot of questions directed at him have been ignored.