+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: The Goal - German Shepherd Dog

                  
   
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    561
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4294967289 Times in 3 Posts

    The Goal - German Shepherd Dog

    Someone sent me the following e-mail. Thought it may interest some of the members here.

    Cheers

    Mark

    The Goal - German Shepherd Dog

    By Amnon Ben Izhak

    If we look at a short history of this breed, we will find that the German shepherd dog of today is completely different from the German shepherd dog as visualized by the founder of the breed, Captain Max von Stephanitz. This dog is slowly losing its place as the number one service dog in the world, that at the same time is a stable and reliable dog.

    Many dogs of this breed suffer from a large number of health problems, such as orthopedic problems, skin problems and more. In addition, dogs of this breed suffer from temperament problems, for instance nervousness, fearfulness and lack of mental stability, and many of them can not function as true working dogs.

    A healthy and intelligent German shepherd, possessing the correct orthopedic build and temperament characteristics established by the breed founder, will disappear in the coming years as if it never existed. In other words, if we do not take dramatic and immediate action to "rescue" this breed, the future generations will only be able to imagine how the German shepherd functioned and served man in a wide variety of tasks. The fate of the breed will be as the fate of many other breeds that were distorted by the FCI standards and fashions of dog showing, as for example the English bulldog, which has changed from a medium sized dog, able to run and jump, to a distorted dog that is barely able to move and for the most part suffers from temperament and health problems. Or the example of the Saint Bernard of today, which can barely "save" itself. In this breed, imprisoned in giant and heavy proportions, no selection for character as related to the purpose of the breed as a rescue dog is carried out, and as a result, it is rare to find a St. Bernard that is capable of doing rescue work.

    If you visit the National Museum of Switzerland located inBern and look at the preserved body of "Bari" – the legendary St. Bernard that saved many lives – you will find a substantial difference between his construction and the construction of the St. Bernard according to the FCI standard and similar.

    How many hunting dogs do you know that can really hunt? Many of you have owned dogs of various breeds, for example, the Dogue de Bordeaux, Bull Mastiff, and others and have found that there is no relationship between the description of the dog, its purpose and character as described in the literature on the breed, and the creature that lives in your home. Have you not asked yourselves why it is so difficult to find dogs that faithfully represent their breeds from the standpoint of character and function?

    The source of the problem is in the ourdays cynology fashion that focuse on show dogs and the obsession surrounding them represented by organizations like FCI ,AKC and similar organizations that endorse and encourage the following subjects: limiting of the genetic base, lack of refreshment of the breeds, incorrect selection, and the fashion of dog shows. In addition there is breeding with the sole goal of profit, and so on. There are breeding coordinators and people in high level positions in organizations and foundations, and even those holding positions in professional organizations (people without any true understanding of genetics, the characteristics of temperament, and the method of correct selection) that interpret incorrectly the breed standard and even serve as judges and advisors on breeding, raising and training dogs. Even worse, these people together give legitimacy to a theory that to my mind is wrong in its foundation.

    Check how many dogs bearing the titles National/International champion faithfully represent their breed (character, health, and healthy conformation)? I am sure that the results will amaze you. Various clubs functioning according to the FCI standards are proud of their selection for character – for example, the ZTP, Koerung, Israel MHG (examination for suitability for breeding), and so on, but any true expert in behavior will ridicule them after finding out how the character is really tested in these examinations.

    In the last hundred years, characteristics of meny breeds have been completely extinguished. The loss of these characteristics and of the purpose of so many breeds, the failure to preserve the functionality of the original breeds for the coming generations, is a highly irresponsible, annoying and sad deed. True dog lovers must do everything necessary to preserve the purpose of the dog. We must not forget that the dog has always been our most true and faithful friend, and that which built the connection between the dog and man throughout history were the legendary temperament characteristics of this wonderful animal. In this article I will not deal with other breeds, only the German shepherd, which I have been raising, training, and researching for the last 15 years and 30 years of experience in training, testing, and seclections of working dogs.

    The present FCI standard describes the German shepherd as a trotting dog with the emphasis in breeding for that factor. This is a major change from the original goal that described the German shepherd as first and foremost a working dog. In my opinion, this change has led to the destruction of the German shepherd breed.



    It seems that Captain Max von Stephanitz foresaw this disaster and said: "Take this trouble for me: Make sure my shepherd dog remains a working dog, for I have struggled all my life long for that aim."

    In my opinion, the FCI and the SV (the German shepherd Dog Club inGermany) are causing the extinction of breed characteristics. They hide behind tests, like Schutzhund, IPO and others, and declare them "working titles". Many good German shepherd breeders fall into this trap and breed dogs for these purposes only. Schutzhund, IPO and other exams of this kind, are not working tests! And certainly not working titles that testify to the true character of the dog.

    In Schutzhund, IPO, and other tests of this sort, the dog and handler perform exercises which are known in advance in sterile conditions. For example, the "defense test" in Schutzhund is not a test of true defense; they do not test the ability of the dog in conditions that are as close as possible to real conditions. This is an exercise and situation that the dog is familiar with in advance and for which he is trained over a period of months. In addition, real control over the dog when there is no attack on the handler is not tested (a real defense dog should not attack if his handler is not attacked and/or gives a command). The "object" in Schutzhund defense tests is a target that in fact cooperates with the dog. Even more, "defense exercises" in these tests take place in a closed field, such as a football field or such, so that the stability of the dog in variable conditions and environments is not tested.

    The "Test of courage" , in this kind of trials, at best will reveal only the worst dogs. That is to say, a relatively poor dog will succeed in passing the test if trained by a skilled trainer and no mistakes have been made in his training.

    The significance of Schutzhund and IPO is not real; they are carried out without any disturbances and in sterile conditions that are well known in advance. Also the tracking part of the test is not realistic; preparation of the track is not natural, the dog carries his nose too low, so that he can not perform tracking in a true manner. I would like to emphasize that I am not against the sport of Schutzhund, IPO, and others. I am very much opposed to those that claim that Schutzhund is a test of working dogs and/or defense dogs. These tests do not show the following:

    1. The mental stability of a dog in conditions of stress.

    2. Defense ability

    3. Obedience in real life conditions

    4. Complex nose work

    5. Courage

    6. Loyalty

    7. Ability of the dog to deal with unfamiliar situations

    As said, tests like Schutzhund, IPO and others have no possibility of checking the true character of the dog, how he deals with real life situations, his working ability and behavior in relation to his environment (adults, children, other animals). To claim that a dog with a "Schutzhund 3" title is a "working dog" is like claiming that a naked man hiding behind a fig leaf is dressed in a knight's armor.

    I would like to say that breeding based on the results of Schutzhund, IPO and other tests is not at all breeding for working ability. Even worse, the distorted animal called " show German shepherd dog" resulting from breeding for appearance is a dog with a humped back, rabbit legs, and long and low croup that almost touches the ground. Many show dogs have completely lost the temperament characteristics and the correct conformation, and from a health standpoint many of them provide a good living to veterinarians.

    In my opinion, it is completely unacceptable to call these dogs "German shepherd dogs". At this point the reader will no doubt ask: "If this is the case, why has the back and hind end of the dog become so distorted, and why despite this are so many breeding these dogs?"

    It becomes apparent that this distortion gives the dog a very long stride with his hind legs, which makes possible movement that is nearly floating. It must be emphasized that this construction is not natural to the dog – many show dogs suffer from severe physical and mental disabilities, because the breeding is based on the trot alone and all the rest is neglected. There are dogs from show breeding that have the title "Schutzhund 3" and so on, and this is a further example why these tests do not assist at all in selective breeding. It is worth emphasizing that many German shepherds from this sort of breeding are not capable of performing work, and some of them have very weak nerves. Lately I have become aware that Czech and Slovak breeders (who in the past bred German shepherds with correct body construction) are lowering the hindquarters of the dogs, lengthening the loin, and arching the back. In not one case alone, I have viewed photos of working Czech and Slovakian dogs where it can clearly be seen how the handler tries by pressing on the croup to lower the hindquarters of the dog. This is like a man trying to sell his car, and showing the buyer photos showing the faults of his vehicle. With the help of this article, I would like to turn to the Czech and Slovakian breeders and of course the East Germans and to say: In the past you bred excellent dogs, dogs that were purchased by buyers from all over the world because they were different from the dogs fromWest Germany. I find it hard to understand why you are determined to spoil the quality and uniqueness that made your dogs so well known. Unfortunately you currently are losing, step by step, the quality. Please, stop the deterioration and breed dogs that are not according to the FCI standard ??? ??????? ????.



    I am certainly aware of the fact that many are partners to my deep concern for the fate of the German shepherd, and that until now there was no alternative.



    When the goal of breeding German shepherds is Schutzhund, IPO and so on (or even worse dog shows) we will never achieve the true and correct German shepherd – a true working dog that is also a family dog. The FCI and the SV has erred completely from the path of the breed founder and are not focusing on breeding for work and for health, and therefore there are German shepherd breeders that have gone on to breed other breeds. An additional reason is the great difficult involved in finding a quality German shepherd.



    Selection for breeding must focus on examination of the dog and not examination of the level of the handler and/or level of training. A true temperament test is one that neither the dog nor the handler knows in advance. A true test examines the temperament of the dog in a wide range of situations and stimuli, and focuses on characteristics, responses and drives of the dog.



    Tests of character, health and suitability – as carried out by the SV and other German shepherd clubs that are members of the FCI – are carried out in a superficial way and do not provide enough information about the true character of the dog. In addition, these tests lack "language" describing conformation and character, so that not much possibility of interpretation based on the amount of information provided is left for each "professional" .



    For example, in the Israel German Shepherd Club, member of the Israel Kennel Club (which is a member of the FCI) the judge of the examination is the breeding coordinator who does not have any experience as a dog trainer or a dog behaviorist. The dog is examined at shows and in sterile areas, the judge observes the dog in movement and static, takes interest in the dog's weight (there is no scale present), shoots a starter's pistol, and with this completes the character test for a German shepherd in the Israel German Shepherd Club.



    In other countries, the helper is dressed with a sleeve (which serves as an objective for the dog) and performs a simple exercise which the dog is familiar with in advance. In this exam, the dog is tested for courage, toughness, persistence and so on. The dog must grip the sleeve of the helper and then is written: "Released sleeve on command/ Did not release sleeve on command". From a distance of 15 steps a starter's pistol is fired and the reaction is written down. It is important to emphasize, that this is not a reaction to shooting but a reaction to noise! Is the dog who does not release the sleeve a bad dog? Maybe his trainer didn't do his job properly? (And what are we checking here? The level of training or the temperament of the dog ? )





    If an immediate and dramatic change will not take place in the interpretation of the standards and in breeding examinations and working tests, in the method of awarding titles, and in the essence of the breeding of German shepherds, this wonderful breed will disappear as if it had never been. If the correct goal is defined, then in the end it will be achieved. But, if the goal is not correct, then the desired goal will never be reached. Therefore, a change is urgently required to save the German shepherd breed.



    Before I get to the solution, I will mention in short the major problems:



    1. It is very difficult, if not impossible, to find German shepherds that are capable of coping with new circumstances successfully, and that are healthy and intelligent.



    2. The standard and essence of breeding of the German shepherd according to the FCI have veered away from the true goal of the breeding of these dogs.



    3. The SV has diverged from the path of the breed's founder, and some of the dogs can't even be called "German shepherds" according to the definition of the founder, Max von Stephanitz.



    4. Breeding that is based on the results of Schutzhund and/or IPO tests is completely mistaken and not breeding for work.



    5. Titles are awarded to dogs that do not correctly represent the breed both in temperament and conformation.



    6. Orthopedic problems (hips, etc.)



    7. Diseases such as hemophilia, skin problems, etc.



    8. Selection and suitability for breeding examinations that do not consider the temperament and health of the dog.



    9. Many temperament problems (in show breeding) and breeding based on Schutzhund, IPO and such.





    I am completely aware of the fact that my article may cause resentment in certain clubs, but I am sure that those that recognize the importance of the German shepherd breed will agree with my words. As I have said, we must act as quickly as possible lest it be too late, and therefore I have founded the International Working German Shepherd Club. I have written a new standard for the breed. I have also developed selection tests, breeding regulations, a working test, and regulations for working titles and conformation titles.



    The goals of the club:



    1. To breed German shepherd dogs that are true in character, health and performance.



    2. To promote and encourage work with the German shepherd.



    3. To encourage private owners of German shepherds to work with their dogs.



    4. To educate to correct, trustworthy and honest cynology.



    5. To define an international language relating to character and conformation. Therefore, I have developed a ranking that includes the important temperament characteristics and drives, and a scale to describe the degrees precisely.



    6. Refreshing of blood lines in the breed.



    7. Competitions.



    8. Registration of German shepherd dogs in one stud book.



    9. International cooperation for the promotion of the breed.



    Amateurs or professionals – if you agree with my opinions and want to be part of the most important cynological process in the last hundred years, I call to you to join us.



    Breeders, trainers, judges that are active or that have left the system because they don't agree with the FCI, AKC, SV, etc., handlers and trainers of army and police dogs, groups that are interested in establishing clubs acting according to the regulations of the IWGSDC – come and participate in the preservation of the German shepherd dog.

    iwgsdc@gmail.com



    We promise to answer anyone who is a partner to our thoughts and directions and interested in assisting and supporting, for our own generation and the generations to come. Please be patient, there are many requests.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Lia Goldie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    250
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 62 Times in 42 Posts

    Re: The Goal - German Shepherd Dog

    Interesting article.

    I am contemplating doing SchH with my next dog, or at least training with a SchH club so that I can do drive training properly (need some help with it, not doing it properly atm). So am tossing up between a GSD and a Malinois. I also have a baby, so a stable temperament is VERY important. The general consensus is that a GSD is a better first SchH dog, and a Mal may be too much. My current GSD (working line non registered) is too soft for SchH, and also has allergies manifested as skin problems. Now, I would write that off as bad luck in the health department, but on another dog forum I am on, there are quite a few GSD owners who have skin problems with their dogs. It is almost tempting to do a Mal on health alone.

    On the point of the article to do with a real working test that tests temperament not training - not sure how you would actually do this? To be fair to all, the test would have to be the same for each dog and the rules written up, you couldn't make it different each time. So training would inevitably come into it, as you would want the dog to be prepared and shown to the best of its abilities.
    "Take this trouble for me: Make sure my shepherd dog remains a working dog, for I have struggled all my life long for that aim"
    Max von Stephanitz

  3. #3
    Summit K9
    Guest

    Re: The Goal - German Shepherd Dog

    Hi Mark

    I can see where the author is coming from and for the most part I agree, but what dramatic and immediate action can be taken when the market for the breed is governed by trendiness and to a great extent profit. Show Dog breeders have damaged the breed genetically for these reasons, and this is probably irreparable.

    I think sport training does a great deal to promote ‘workability’. It may not be the ‘workability’ the author wants; and may not reflect ‘real’ conditions, but how can it? Only dogs on the streets are being utilised in real conditions/situations, they are however trained on the training field which is not real, also all the real scenario training in the world cannot IMO replicate what happens on the street. Is it better to have sports like IPO and Schutzhund available...of course it is, otherwise so called true working line dogs wouldn’t be available to the police and the military or anybody else, because most of their dogs come from sport bloodlines anyway (other than donated dogs), therefore if these organisations didn’t breed themselves (they do on a limited scale) where would they get potential candidates from?

    I see two points in the author’s “goals” for his club which I find somewhat ambiguous in light of his previous statements:

    “To promote and encourage work with the German shepherd”

    “To encourage private owners of German shepherds to work with their dogs”

    I would ask how he proposes to encourage and promote work with the GSD when he decries sports such as IPO and Schutzhund, and how do private owners work their dogs if they have no training or experience, and where do they go to get that experience if not to sport clubs? Breeders are the problem not clubs, they do however have every right to breed as they see fit. I may not agree with their ethos on breeding, but there’s not a lot I can do to change it other than steer clear of them. There are still excellent working GSD breeders around who cater for experienced people and are extremely discerning in who they will sell a dog/pup to; there may not be many, but anybody with a keen and genuine interest should be able to find the right breeder if they research hard enough. Working/sport line dogs are not to be ‘tried out’ by inexperienced untrained handlers if they are not embarking on a genuine quest to learn and participate in sport/work training, unless they join the police, military or security, their only avenue is to join a good sport club.

    I would gladly join any organisation which promoted good working line breeding, but realistically that organisation shouldn’t exclude sport training clubs, because some of the best trainers around are from sport backgrounds.

    In regard to “testing”; temperament testing is done all the time by organisations such as the military and the police. The whole idea is to test an untrained unprepared dog to establish it’s suitability for training for the particular role it’s intended for, and even if they pass that test they may ‘wash-out’ during the course. You cannot train a dog to pass a temperament test. When testing you want the dog to react naturally (not as trained) to given stimuli; whichever way the dog reacts determines it’s suitability at that stage to be accepted for training.

    Peter

  4. #4
    mustangz
    Guest

    Re: The Goal - German Shepherd Dog

    Quote Originally Posted by Summit K9
    Hi Mark

    ..... their only avenue is to join a good sport club.


    Peter
    EXACTLY!!! and finding one of those is soooo difficult without the whole political CRAP that comes with it!

    i was also emailed that article and find it interesting!! i do also agree what you are saying there peter about tthe showlines breeder ruining the breed as it's all about looks for them...
    i'm a member of a gsd yahoo group and recieved an interesting email today about SCH III dogs (showlines)

    i have taken out some parts of it so that it's not a dead give away but it rings true about the whole divided gsd range...
    i also have found and feel that there are working line breeders (GSDS) that are trying to breed dogs that bite and bite alone... where are the dogs gone that will be a dog when you want it to be a dog and defend you when it senses it needs defence...

    .... we went to the BZS in Aachen.
    .... on Friday the "protectionwork" is done,
    As we all know we, sadly enough, have a breed that is devided in working- and showlines (and the occasional crossing between these two).
    In comparisson with i.e the WUSV we see at a BZS > 1700 dogs..... (WUSV is apprx 130)
    Well this amount is entered but is not a guarentee that they will show.

    What is very important in the name of the event is ZUCHT --> BREED.
    So it is NOT just a nice dog but in the Gebrauchklasse Males they also look at what males have produced (nachkommen).

    But all stands and falls with the protectionwork.
    If that is not good you can go home.

    here is our experience of the protectionwork today and some thoughts.

    First of all let me state that these kind of situations can not be trained.
    You are in a stadium where the field is devided by a fence so the Males and Females can do protectionwork at the same time.
    There are thousands of people on the stands and where can you get those for practices/training.
    These people make noise i.e if a males did some nice work they will applaude and the female is yet to bite at that time.
    There is a tent on the field, helpers, judges etc.
    So, no, you cannot practise the situation.

    At each side, males and females, there are 5 helpers so you do not know which one you will get at they rotate constantly.
    The one that has done the longbite, will do the short part next etc.

    Despite all of that, we would expect dogs to show some good work.
    We are talking about SCHH III dogs who at least have done one koerung!!!!

    But what do we see......???
    Very poor healing or at least what should look like healing.
    Some dogs do not even heal at all and their weekend is over in less than one minute.
    Handlers who need to speed up just to keep track of the dogs.....
    And here is the first thing that bothers me.
    If a dog does not heal, they get another two chances to get it right.....
    If this was a schutzhundrouting (oeps it is) at the WUSV and the dog is not in control (or the handler is not in control) it's over.

    Then the grips of the dog.
    The dogs I have seen today (and that was not all of the dogs) for 99% had poor grips.
    Some would start with, what looks like, a full grip but would end up with hardly any grip at all.

    Then the outphase.
    Again we are talking about SchH III dogs.
    They, most of them, just do not want to out.
    And, except for a few, if they out you should look at they way they out.
    That's chewing untill there is nothing left to chew.

    And then the guardingphase.....
    One of the most important phases in the protection.
    Here the dog is alone as has to show courage to, at least, stay with the helper and guard him.
    But what do we see?
    Many dogs that stay with the helper and guard almost everything but the helper.
    Here we also see handlers running to their dogs so the guardingphase doesn't last too long.
    And if the dog does all of the above the handler almost is as happy as someone winning gold at the olympics......

    Besides the dogs that did it today we also saw some dogs that just didn't bite period.
    Here again, SchH III?????
    It was not that i.e they missed in timing, no it was not biting!

    In the whole process of this we also see helpers that almost stand still on the long bite.
    Why?
    It's not that they need to run like an idiot towards the dogs, but at least show some threat.
    Also there you can test some courage of the dog.
    What we see is that lots of dogs just step on the break.

    the only reason for writing this piece is that these males, and females, are the future of our breed. They will decide where the breed is going.
    They will pass on these threats towards many progeny.
    I.e the sieger, will get many breedings from, maybe, good females but also crap females. And with that we will keep on seeing the same blood over and over again in years to come.
    People will buy dogs from these kennels where they will be told that the father is such a good dog because it has SchH III and is nice looking. And THAT is THE problem.
    We saw some very well build dogs (which of course is pure logic as we are at the BZS ) but when it comes to working in protection..... this IS NOT a GSD!

    It is imo sad but true.

    I know that people who like the showdogs more than the workinglines will not like the above.
    On the other hand it is how it is today.
    It was not that I woke up from a bad dream, no I was there to witness it.
    We saw crap protectionwork
    And the dogs that passed (in way way or the other) today, most of them got AUSGEPRÄGT LESST AB.....??????????

    Like I wrote above, I have not seen all the dogs but my experience says that what we saw is how it is nowadays.
    The dog must look nice and the workingpart is secondary to it all.
    Still these dogs are used in movies, televisionseries etc and for millions of people this type of dog IS the GSD.

    In the past I have stated in my posts that points are not important and sport is just one criteria.
    But for me a GSD must show workingabilities and sadly enough today we did not see that.

    Does this mean all the dogs were bad.
    No of course not.
    The one that wasn't was Annick van de Herdersfarm, indeed a female!!!!!

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Neglected German shepherd looks like new dog - OCRegister
    By forumfeed in forum Whats in the NEWS?
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-23-2010, 04:55 PM
  2. The Goal - German Shepherd Dog
    By Mark S in forum Working Breed Discussions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-13-2008, 02:13 PM

Visitors found this page by searching for:

amnon Breeding Selection test

difference between a working german shepherd and a show german shepherd

selection characteristics breeding of german shepherds

cynology

SEO Blog

Members who have read this thread : 9

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts