jeff jones (02-02-2011), Neville Patterson (02-02-2011)
I also agree in principle to what both Robert and Nev are saying. Just because a dog handler is a member of the services, doesn't guarantee, highly trained dogs. Operational standard doesn't mean a dog will be under absolute control in ALL situations. However a dog should be under handler control in 'normal' situations. I also agree with Nev about the state of the SA Dog Squad. The funds they are allocated I have heard are an absolute joke, and therefore have to rely on donations from the public. Aren't we lucky that their guns and cars aren't donated? It is a disgrace. These guys don't even enter any national police dog service competitions because they know the standard of their dogs is not good enough to compete. It's an embarrassment. I feel for these guys.
I however also believe these extreme drive and short nerved dogs to easily go over the top in real life high adrenaline situations, and handlers are unable to flatten the drive or switch it off. Much like trying to stop a dog full on in fight drive. If we look at levels 0 being calm, but alert and 10 being switching into full on fight. Once the dog get past 8 or 9 the more difficult it is to switch these dogs off. Try stopping a pit bull in a fight?
Also I do not believe that governemnt handlers of these extreme dogs are cowboys, as such. They spend a lot of hours every week focusing on control and obedience in training. However real life can be a totally different situation.
jeff jones (02-02-2011), Neville Patterson (02-02-2011)
Actions : (View-Readers)