[=Monika Kawecki;16424]In the big malinois thred someone posted that a dog named Elgos has had 451 matings.
I nearly fell of the chair when I read that!
My question is - what do you consider a good success rate in producing dogs?
Being involved in showing and having owned one the most famous show dogs in last 10 years I can give you some stats. And would like to compare this to what breeders (and dog owners) consider being sucessfull producer.
My dog has studed 7 or 8 times. On average 8 pups so thats aprox 60 pups all up.
Out of them there were from memory 12 champions, 1 grand champion ( 10 times the champion) and one nearly a grand champion.
There were few additional dogs that were on the way to their championship and didnt finish it for some other reason - such as owners lack of interest.
And there were several that could have easily been shown and titled but there was noone interested in doing it so they were sold as pets and never seen again, so to speak. So lets say its a 25% sucess rate.
So when I come back to that Elgos dog and say that from his 451 matings at an average of 6 pups (less for malinois) that would be 2700 pups.
At the 25% sucess rate - which for such famous dog I would consider low, there should be 675 totally awesome dogs, to continue his lines. Not grand kids, just his kids.
Were there? Does anyone know?
I know that most people in here dont care (or are even against) showing, but I wanted to do a bit of a hypothetical comparison.
If you are a breeder, or have a very good stud dog what do you consider good sucess?
50%? 10%? 100%?
I dont think that 100% is achieveable, as something will always crop up, the floppy ear, the bit weaker hips, the wrong coat, fear of loud noises etc.[/]
Hi Monika,
For the record, I am not against showing at all, a dog display is good working or showing, but what I am against is people breeding working dogs for conformation only and disregarding the character and temperament of the dog and calling them "champions". If you bought a champion working dog you would expect to be able to train and work that dog for what the breed is supposed to be able to achieve and if you can't, the dog is not a "champion's" bootlace. I talk GSD's as it's the breed I know, but picture this:
Someone looks through the breed standards and thinks excellent, a GSD is exactly what I need and buys a pup from "champion" parents on the belief that a "champion" should have a high level of the required breed traits. Begins to train the pup to find out it won't chase a ball and doesn't have enough drive to be disobedient???. In effect, the buyer is a victim of a con job from breed mismanagement that the show fraternity has caused being one problem that exists. It's not the showing, it's the mentality that drives the majority of show people is what annoys me about them. IMHO a show is a display of dogs that comply with the breed standard and a "champion" is the best example of the breed in it's entirety.
Cheers
Nev




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote
One of my friends has this title on her Papillon (he is an AWESOME dog and is nicknamed the Pap on Crack! He can keep with and sometimes beat the super fast Border Collies despite his small size.)

