+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Suitable Breeds to use for Detection Roles in Public?

                  
   
  1. #1
    Member Chris Flegler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Ipswich QLD Australia
    Posts
    68
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 40 Times in 22 Posts

    Suitable Breeds to use for Detection Roles in Public?

    I'm interested to know peoples opinion on what breeds of dog you think are more suitable to use for detection roles in a public environment. For example are "softer" breeds such as Labs, Springers, Beagles etc more suitable then the perceived "threatening" breeds such as Malinois, Dutchie or GSD? Or should the priority be that the best dog available be used no matter what the breed?(assuming the dog is well trained and social).

    I would really like to hear anyones opinion even if you have no experience in this area your opinion is still very much valid.

    Cheers

    Chris

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Chris Flegler For This Useful Post:

    Owen Baxter (04-10-2011)

  3. #2
    Member
    Threadstarter
    Chris Flegler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Ipswich QLD Australia
    Posts
    68
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 40 Times in 22 Posts
    Nobody has an opinion?

  4. #3
    Administrator Vendo Vincent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    613
    Thanks
    227
    Thanked 295 Times in 140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    I think a lot depends on the application and also the response you are look to get from the animal.
    Vendo.
    ------ TALK IS CHEAP.... SHOW US YOUR DOG.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Vendo Vincent For This Useful Post:

    Owen Baxter (04-10-2011)

  6. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia, Australia
    Posts
    88
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 42 Times in 29 Posts
    Im gunna be upfront i have no experience in this field but i think a dual purpose dog would be a better option one that can apphend suspect and detect substance

    Now im not sure if a single purpose dog will have a higher sucess rate?? from more hours training just purely scent detection

    but if the detection is for drug In my personal experience if someone is for example selling drugs they deal with a higher ratio of unsavoury characters and have alot more "balls" or attitude than your average joe so there a higher probility of them making a drastic decision whilst under pressure like running or fighting back when they know they have illegal substance on there persons

    I think the mals and dutchies arnt as visually intimidating to the public are would be a better choice than a large dog only reason is that when i had a large Black working GSD people would give me a wide berth this may reduce the possible of a find and you might dismiss the behaviour as normal of the general public while while if your use to people just casually walking past you will pick up if someone changes there tragetery as soon as they notice you but the people giving you a wide berth allows the scent cone to take a extra couple second to be detected by the dog and that’s all they may need to evade detection im having trouble explaing my point of view via written text so I hope you know what I mean

    on a side note LOL i dunno if the mals and dutchie will be able to passive indicate hahah

  7. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    322
    Thanks
    294
    Thanked 371 Times in 191 Posts
    I don't think in public detection to have an intimidating dog is a good thing in the perception that someone uniformed with a dog resembling a GSD is seen by most as an animal to fear which is not ideal in that role. If the dog is protection trained mingling amounst the public sniffing them, it doesn't take much action for the dog to possibly mount an attack if someone was to act in a threatening manner towards the dog or handler and for that reason I wouldn't multi task a protection trained dog. I have used a defence K9 in search and rescue but only as a matter of having the closest tracker to deploy at the time, but with a dog trained to track and apprehend, I sure needed to keep good control on the dog and would have been easier on the mind with a dog tracking trained only when searching for non offenders.

    Personally, I don't think protection training and public detection is a safe combination.

    Cheers
    Nev

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Neville Patterson For This Useful Post:

    Lia Goldie (04-12-2011), Mark (04-10-2011), Owen Baxter (04-10-2011), Robert Santori (04-10-2011)

  9. #6
    Mark Singer Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    220
    Thanks
    101
    Thanked 336 Times in 151 Posts
    Totally agree with Nev.. Passive detection and protection does NOT nor should NOT mix... These multipurpose type dogs are more a liability than a anything else
    Last edited by Mark; 04-10-2011 at 10:41 AM.
    Mark Singer
    Adelaide Canine Training

    www.caninetraining.com.au

  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Mark For This Useful Post:

    Chris Flegler (04-10-2011), jeff jones (04-11-2011), Neville Patterson (04-10-2011), Owen Baxter (04-10-2011)

  11. #7
    Junior Member Owen Baxter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Logan
    Posts
    7
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
    Hi Chris,
    It does depend on the purpose and job at hand.
    But for the majority, I definately would not cross / dual train, such as protection and detection.
    As Neville and Mark stated this scenario could get completely out of hand, and become your worst nightmare.
    For our industry's perception and reputation we can not afford to tarnish our public credibility
    and image, instead we need to work more proactively to enhance our collective public perception and image.
    Unfortunately, therefore I do not personally consider that Dobs, Rotties, Gsds or Mals have a place in detection, in say
    a international airport lounge, they just create a fear reaction in the average person.
    All things aside- just consider the public liability insurance premiums in having these breeds within public areas- they would likely to be prohitive.

    So I guess we are stuck with the lower drive breeds, Beagles, Bloodhounds, Spaniels, Labs, etc to meet this niche.
    But the must keep in mind that, these breeds have been selected and bred for a specialised portion of the prey drive response. ( which occurs in 5 parts).

    Cheers,
    Owen Baxter

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Owen Baxter For This Useful Post:

    Mark (04-10-2011), Neville Patterson (04-10-2011)

  13. #8
    Mark Singer Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    220
    Thanks
    101
    Thanked 336 Times in 151 Posts
    I don't have an issue with protection/security type dogs trained as active response (detection) dogs, that are being utilized for building searches, locker rooms, etc. Just not the passive dogs used to search individuals.

    However I feel it best not to have multipurpose dogs.. Your dog is either a protector or a detector.. Focus your dog training on one specialised area per dog. Makes life so much easier for both you and your dog
    Mark Singer
    Adelaide Canine Training

    www.caninetraining.com.au

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mark For This Useful Post:

    Neville Patterson (04-10-2011), Owen Baxter (04-10-2011)

  15. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    7
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 12 Times in 6 Posts
    As a matter of fact the term “low drive breeds” in regards to breeds not specifically used for bitework in inaccurate. Springer Spaniels of the working variety are in fact extremely high in prey/hunt drive that is why they are used for drug detection/explosive and trained for passive indication. Beagles on the other hand are just as scent driven but less manic on their search which suits airport type environments. Dual Purpose Dogs haven been used in the past but not in a public environment, drug raids specifically on drug houses used to be operationally suitable. Dual Purpose was in fact a cost cutting system to save using/training/feeding/kennelling two dogs.

  16. #10
    Mark Singer Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    220
    Thanks
    101
    Thanked 336 Times in 151 Posts
    Also beagles are not trained in prey drive.. but food drive..
    Mark Singer
    Adelaide Canine Training

    www.caninetraining.com.au

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Visitors found this page by searching for:

Nobody landed on this page from a search engine, yet!
SEO Blog

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts