Owen Baxter (04-10-2011)
I'm interested to know peoples opinion on what breeds of dog you think are more suitable to use for detection roles in a public environment. For example are "softer" breeds such as Labs, Springers, Beagles etc more suitable then the perceived "threatening" breeds such as Malinois, Dutchie or GSD? Or should the priority be that the best dog available be used no matter what the breed?(assuming the dog is well trained and social).
I would really like to hear anyones opinion even if you have no experience in this area your opinion is still very much valid.
Cheers
Chris
Owen Baxter (04-10-2011)
Nobody has an opinion?
I think a lot depends on the application and also the response you are look to get from the animal.
Vendo.
------ TALK IS CHEAP.... SHOW US YOUR DOG.
Owen Baxter (04-10-2011)
Im gunna be upfront i have no experience in this field but i think a dual purpose dog would be a better option one that can apphend suspect and detect substance
Now im not sure if a single purpose dog will have a higher sucess rate?? from more hours training just purely scent detection
but if the detection is for drug In my personal experience if someone is for example selling drugs they deal with a higher ratio of unsavoury characters and have alot more "balls" or attitude than your average joe so there a higher probility of them making a drastic decision whilst under pressure like running or fighting back when they know they have illegal substance on there persons
I think the mals and dutchies arnt as visually intimidating to the public are would be a better choice than a large dog only reason is that when i had a large Black working GSD people would give me a wide berth this may reduce the possible of a find and you might dismiss the behaviour as normal of the general public while while if your use to people just casually walking past you will pick up if someone changes there tragetery as soon as they notice you but the people giving you a wide berth allows the scent cone to take a extra couple second to be detected by the dog and that’s all they may need to evade detection im having trouble explaing my point of view via written text so I hope you know what I mean
on a side note LOL i dunno if the mals and dutchie will be able to passive indicate hahah
I don't think in public detection to have an intimidating dog is a good thing in the perception that someone uniformed with a dog resembling a GSD is seen by most as an animal to fear which is not ideal in that role. If the dog is protection trained mingling amounst the public sniffing them, it doesn't take much action for the dog to possibly mount an attack if someone was to act in a threatening manner towards the dog or handler and for that reason I wouldn't multi task a protection trained dog. I have used a defence K9 in search and rescue but only as a matter of having the closest tracker to deploy at the time, but with a dog trained to track and apprehend, I sure needed to keep good control on the dog and would have been easier on the mind with a dog tracking trained only when searching for non offenders.
Personally, I don't think protection training and public detection is a safe combination.
Cheers
Nev
Lia Goldie (04-12-2011), Mark (04-10-2011), Owen Baxter (04-10-2011), Robert Santori (04-10-2011)
Totally agree with Nev.. Passive detection and protection does NOT nor should NOT mix... These multipurpose type dogs are more a liability than a anything else
Last edited by Mark; 04-10-2011 at 10:41 AM.
Chris Flegler (04-10-2011), jeff jones (04-11-2011), Neville Patterson (04-10-2011), Owen Baxter (04-10-2011)
Hi Chris,
It does depend on the purpose and job at hand.
But for the majority, I definately would not cross / dual train, such as protection and detection.
As Neville and Mark stated this scenario could get completely out of hand, and become your worst nightmare.
For our industry's perception and reputation we can not afford to tarnish our public credibility
and image, instead we need to work more proactively to enhance our collective public perception and image.
Unfortunately, therefore I do not personally consider that Dobs, Rotties, Gsds or Mals have a place in detection, in say
a international airport lounge, they just create a fear reaction in the average person.
All things aside- just consider the public liability insurance premiums in having these breeds within public areas- they would likely to be prohitive.
So I guess we are stuck with the lower drive breeds, Beagles, Bloodhounds, Spaniels, Labs, etc to meet this niche.
But the must keep in mind that, these breeds have been selected and bred for a specialised portion of the prey drive response. ( which occurs in 5 parts).
Cheers,
Owen Baxter
Mark (04-10-2011), Neville Patterson (04-10-2011)
I don't have an issue with protection/security type dogs trained as active response (detection) dogs, that are being utilized for building searches, locker rooms, etc. Just not the passive dogs used to search individuals.
However I feel it best not to have multipurpose dogs.. Your dog is either a protector or a detector.. Focus your dog training on one specialised area per dog. Makes life so much easier for both you and your dog![]()
Neville Patterson (04-10-2011), Owen Baxter (04-10-2011)
As a matter of fact the term “low drive breeds” in regards to breeds not specifically used for bitework in inaccurate. Springer Spaniels of the working variety are in fact extremely high in prey/hunt drive that is why they are used for drug detection/explosive and trained for passive indication. Beagles on the other hand are just as scent driven but less manic on their search which suits airport type environments. Dual Purpose Dogs haven been used in the past but not in a public environment, drug raids specifically on drug houses used to be operationally suitable. Dual Purpose was in fact a cost cutting system to save using/training/feeding/kennelling two dogs.
Also beagles are not trained in prey drive.. but food drive..
Actions : (View-Readers)